Und der Hollywood Reporter ist offensichtlich der Einzige, der die richtigen Fragen stellt. Das Interview mit dem Ex-Naughty-Dog-Chef ist jedenfalls “required reading”.
Mein Lieblingszitat, welches einen klaren Kopf beweist (wenn jemand mal wieder nach “Innovativen Konzepten” schreit):

THR: What about sequels? Same story?
Rubin: Completely different. If you want to blame someone for the number of sequels, blame the consumer. They love them, they buy them, and so I really don’t see a problem there. If “Tony Hawk 58″ is what gamers want, so be it. It’s a different world in games than in movies. Sequels to games tend to get better, and because they are interactive, the gameplay is different. I mean, “Grand Theft Auto 5″ has sold better than “GTA 4″ and “GTA 3,” so why not do “GTA 6″? From a business standpoint, even if it costs more, you’d do it. Because that’s obviously what the consumer wants. As long as we keep innovating in our sequels, I just don’t see it as a problem.

Keine Kommentare möglich